Digital Government Project Meeting Summary
December 12, 2002
1:30 pm in 216 Bolz Hall
RAs & co-PI’s
Appendix A
| Appendix B
| Appendix C
| Appendix D
| Appendix E
| Appendix F
| Appendix G
| Appendix H
| Future Meetings
Attendees:
OSU Mapping & GIS Lab: Dr. Ron Li (PI), Dr. Ahmed Elaksher,
Ruijin Ma, Xutong Niu
OSU Geodesy Lab: Kai-chien (Kevin) Cheng, Chung-Yen Kuo
OSU Center for Mapping: Tarig Ali
SUNY at Buffalo: Xian Xu (reported by E-mail)
Great Lakes Forecasting System Laboratory: Vasilia Velissariou
OSU Geodesy Lab: Hari N. Sugavanam
Summary:
Kevin Cheng discussed differences between the GPS buoy and Marblehead tide-gauge data sets. The buoy was deployed for six hours while placed a few meters from the gauge station (see Appendix A ). He visited the gauge and mentioned that the gauge is just on the shore.
Ruijin Ma reported on his work with the ODNR permit system. He has finished the five functions required by the ODNR and the system now can now evaluate any structure based on these functions. He has started implementing the system with real data (see Appendix B ).
Chung-Yen Kuo reported on the differences between the
T/P altimetry data, gauge stations, and TG-Geosat altimetry data (see
Appendix C)
.
Xian Xu reported by E-mail that he has been collaborating intensively with Niu on the program. He began using MapObject for Java that can be used to develop a java program, modifying the program to read Arc/Info coverage files. Currently he can only read in local files for Arc/Info coverage. Appendix D shows a screenshot of the program interface.
Xutong Niu gave a presentation on remote access to the spatial database (see Appendix F ). In it he summarized various methods for accessing the spatial databases on different servers. He briefed the group on the current status of the system he and Xian Xu are generating. He also reported that he is working on evaluating the shoreline differences and the differences between the DEM elevations and gauge station water levels.
Tarig Ali gave a presentation on the status of his work on the project (see Appendix G ). He is currently working on developing new methods for visualization of the quality of the linear features and studying their interdependency. He is studying the accuracy of shorelines generated by single photos and evaluating the potential for using shorelines digitized from single photos in his erosion awareness system.
Ahmed Elaksher reported on the water surfaces generated by the Great Lakes Forecasting Lab. He gave a presentation about the differences between these water surfaces (MHW, MLW, MMW). Xutong noted that he asked Rami about these surfaces, who said they are three-month averages (see Appendix H ). Xutong also showed the edited video for Tampa, which shows the area of sea grass on which the project team is going to work during the upcoming months.
Vasilia Velissariou reported that she has started looking at the Great Lakes Forecasting Lab database and will start calculating the statistical water surfaces (MLLW, MW, MHW). She mentioned that the lab data is now on the Internet.
Action List:
Attachments
For more information, E-mail:
li.282@osu.edu
Appendix A: GPS Buoy and Marblehead Tide Gauge Water Levels
Appendix B: Screenshot of Data Input for the ODNR Permit System
Appendix C: Difference between Altitude Data and Gauge Station Water Levels in Lake Erie
Appendix D: Screenshot of the Program Designed by Xian Xu
1. Given three kinds of data in three locations:
|
Data |
Type of Data |
Format |
Location |
|
1 |
Shoreline |
Shapefiles |
GIS and Mapping Server |
|
2 |
DEM |
GRID data in Coverage |
SUNY Server |
|
3 |
Water Surface |
Grid data in Coverage |
Shoreline Server |
2. The program will be designed so that it:
- Provides a function for configuring above data sources. Once data sources are added, they will be remembered by the program.
- Add these three data sets into the map layer, and then display them.